Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-styears peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Slimming down discipline is mentioned because of the Weight reduction Size of your Restaurants Thinking Take to (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), composed of 16 statements scored into an excellent 6-section level (never ever = 0/constantly = 5), which have large scores proving an advanced level away from controlled restaurants. For the Consume psychometrical functions caliente Peruano chica look for Gather mais aussi al. (1982). This new texture coefficient for both trials, the fresh new North american country and you may German of those, try of the identical worth, an alpha of 0.76.
Weightloss restraint
Ineffectiveness level. The brand new bad apply at factor is projected from the Ineffectiveness Scale off the Restaurants Issues Index (EDI) (Garner mais aussi al., 1983), which has illustrated a beneficial convergent legitimacy (ineffectiveness/self confidence ) out-of R = 0.70 (p
Scientific team took the extra weight and top steps
Bmi (BMI). Body mass index try calculated as the pounds when you look at the kilograms split by top for the square meters (Body mass index = kg/m2).
In advance of data range, an effective pilot examination of the newest Silhouettes Measure (Figure step one), placed on a sample comprising 20 North american country students, was applied to check the fresh appropriateness of figures in order to show system products, in order to validate an excellent acceptation out-of an as yet not known number of silhouettes and you will a definite comprehension of the latest directions (the new Italian language group currently measured having research within this respect). The outcome showed the Silhouette Size is an excellent or a keen compatible tool to the North american country test.
The brand new detectives of these two countries, from the Mexico City as well as Hae (standardized) process. The fresh new forms had been applied to sets of scientific and you may medical students at Mexican and you can German colleges. One reason why behind the fresh ples out-of students regarding medication try just the focus one to (one could imagine) such young adults need to have with the scientific community and health problems, leading them to more attentive to troubles such as ED. Informed consent is obtained from most of the study members. All of the called children accessible to participate. The brand new particular local integrity committees recognized the latest low-invasive procedure. Top-notch translators undertook and controlled the new translation and you can retranslation of your devices.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for