The new questionnaire consisted of step 3 pieces. Region I included issues regarding socio-demographic data (decades, quantity of education, parity, familial earnings, community, latest relationship position, sexual activity, history of HPV vaccination, and reputation of abnormal cervical cancers evaluation).
Region II made up of six questions about the goal women that are screened, decades to start, regularity, age or criteria to get rid of from testing, and techniques out-of tests. Precisely the players who had have you ever heard away from HPV create proceed in order to Area III which examined information about HPV out-of their particular (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), means out-of indication and you can cures.
Before the study, the latest survey out-of region II and you will region III into the Thai adaptation was in fact considered, chatted about, and you can changed up to opinion certainly one of 20 researchers who had been all of the gynecologic oncologists (certain have been article writers in other synchronous training). The professionals ranked every one of 19 concerns while the possibly ‘relevant’ or ‘maybe not relevant’. The item-height Content Authenticity Index (I-CVI) try determined per items, and the Stuff Authenticity Directory (CVI) is determined by taking the typical ratio from fourteen questions relating to information about cervical cancer tumors evaluating and you can 5 questions about HPV. The newest CVI have been 1 both for elements of this new questionnaire (S1 Table). The brand new precision is checked-out during the 29 feminine with similar trait as players. The fresh new Cronbach’ alpha coefficients to the accuracy was indeed 0.819 to have knowledge about cervical cancer screening and you can 0.907 having understanding of HPV.
Studies range
Towards the date from arranged colposcopy, the analysis assistant provided suggestions of your own data on the female just who came across introduction criteria. The women whom agreed to participate offered composed told agree and answered the fresh new survey alone themselves just before proceeding to colposcopy.
Study obtained for it study was in fact socio-market research (Area I of your own questionnaire), knowledge of cervical cancer tumors tests (Part II), and you will experience in HPV (Area III).
Mathematical research
The newest solutions of knowledge on the cervical cancer tumors testing and you can HPV had been assessed by per item before rating categorization. Right answer try obtained since step one whereas ‘completely wrong and you will unsure answer’ was scored 0.
Out-of 14 questions from cervical malignant tumors examination, female whoever score have been ? ten was randomly categorized due to the fact that have ‘a good knowledge’ normally had been thought to be having “not good training”. For knowledge of HPV, feminine whose address is ‘never heard about HPV’ was excluded regarding research off HPV studies.
Off 5 questions, feminine whose rating have been ? 3 was indeed considered as which have ‘good experience in HPV’ if not given that ‘not good knowledge’. Regarding 19 questions, feminine whoever score was in fact ? 13 had been categorized while the having ‘good total knowledge’ usually while the ‘not-good full knowledge’.
Every investigation was gathered in an electronic database and you may reviewed playing with SPSS V.twenty-six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chi town, IL, USA). Detailed statistics were used to analyze market analysis and had been summarized due to the fact number which have commission, imply that have standard deviation otherwise median having variety brightwomen.net Ressourcer. The new association ranging from for each and every varying and you can degree score were examined having fun with simple linear regression. Exploratory model was created during the multivariable analysis also most of the parameters possibly pertaining to the data score. The brand new felt level of statistical value was good p-value of 0.05 or less.
Results
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>