Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Meters. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you can Human Conclusion, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place off connection into the people mating. Report about Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An excellent. (2002). Sites paradox reviewed. Journal regarding Public Issues, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites contradiction: A social technology you to decrease personal involvement and you may emotional better-are? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Yards., & Areas, J. M. (2001). Amount, timing, and you can time of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Newest Population Account, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional studies from closeness, interests, and you may partnership: Research brand new assumptions of triangular principle from love. Psychological Accounts, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step three.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Effect finest on doing even worse: Societal reviews in this close relationships. Diary of Identification and you will Public Mindset, gorgeousbrides.net beskrivelse 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A great., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: New implicit cognition from close competition. Diary out of Personality and you may Social Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
A. (2001)mitment and you will relationships restoration systems
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you can attractive choice: The changed therapy from dating maintenance. Development and Peoples Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential studies of dispute and accord from inside the disturb and you can nondistressed marital people. Log out of Asking and you will Health-related Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A beneficial., Environmentally friendly, A beneficial. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Dating formation online: What’s the big interest? Diary of Public Items, 58(1), 9–29.
The advantages of confident illusions: Idealization additionally the design out-of satisfaction into the personal matchmaking
Neff, L. An effective., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-evaluation purposes within the intimate matchmaking: A style of global enhancement and you will specific confirmation. Into the P. Noller & J. An effective. Feeney (Eds.), Wisdom ents regarding study of partners communications (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge University Force.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-specialist thread from the contact out-of attachment concept. Psychotherapy: Idea, Search, Behavior, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). New social monitoring program: Enhanced sensitiveness to personal signs because an adaptive response to social exception. During the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The personal outcast: Ostracism, societal different, rejection, and you may bullying (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Therapy Push.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). International and you may specific relational designs throughout the connection with personal connections. Diary away from Character and you will Social Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. Good., Tran, S., ). Attachment and advice seeking within the close relationship. Identification and you will Societal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you may particular connection representations into the adulthood: Can there be a romance?. Record Out of Personal And personal Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Inside J. Harvey & A good. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal intimate dating: Fix and you may improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A beneficial. D. (2000). Projection truly impact certainly one of partners given that a purpose of the fresh similarity within mutual skills. Personality And you can Personal Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Ramifications of salience of extrinsic rewards to your taste and you will loving. Record out of Identification and you may Societal Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.